| |
India is already the champion in application software. Now a
set of small firms is turning it into a top destination for product
development. If you belong to one of the thousands of
companies across the world using Google enterprise solutions and
have used IBM Lotus Notes or MS Sharepoint for intranet data search,
then you owe it to a little-known Indian company. It's the
Pune-based Persistent Systems that integrated these content access
connectors with Google search appliance and it is now working on
blending security and policy connectors like Netegrity and
SiteMinder with Google. Or, if you are impressed by those music
sharing sites where you can share music legally and earn rewards,
just remember that the complete software used by one of the popular
start-ups in this sphere was built by Aditi Technologies, another
small company based in Bangalore. And all Aditi's engineers had to
work on was an eight-page vision document that the start-up handed
over. "They did not want to build an in-house technology team, so we
built the product from start to finish in 11 months, overcoming
several challenges," says Pradeep Singh, Founder & CEO, Aditi.
Today, he asserts, this product gets 35 million hits a day and is
bundled with Microsoft Windows Media Player 10.0!
Persistent and Aditi are among the pioneers of
software product development in India-a country known the world over
for its exceptional talent in software application development (or
ADM, in industry parlance) but never a force in product development.
But now, a new set of Indian companies-Aditi, Persistent, Aspire
Systems, AztecSoft, IndusLogic, Ness Technologies, PSI Data,
Symphony Services, Vertusa and so on-are making a mark in the world
of product services domain by partnering with independent software
vendors (ISVs) like Microsoft, Google, Oracle, Adobe arid Computer
Associates.
Termed outsourced product development, or OPD, this involves out-
sourcing of activities, either in part or the whole, related to the
development and maintenance of a software product. Take Microsoft
for example. It has a huge product catalogue and billions of dollars
are spent every year to launch newer ones. Naturally, it has finite
resources, which would be better spent on cutting-edge R&D. So
it outsources maintenance of older products (Windows 98) or upgrades
of existing products (Windows XP) to a third party. If it helps save
time and money, even bits and pieces of its new product development
(Vista) could be outsourced. And this is where niche OPD players
come into the picture.
Coming Of Age "Product development was once
considered the last area that a software product company was willing
to outsource to India. This has changed," says Singh of Aditi. He
says that OPD in India began with product testing, which required
people to manually test new software products; the next wave
involved adding new functionalities to existing software products;
and, since then, the industry has moved to building competitive
software products.
The customers are essentially of two genres. First there are the
large ISVs that begin with outsourcing just one or two activities
and, only after they are confident with the delivery capabilities of
their OPD partner, look at expanding the relationship further. And
then, there are start-ups that are open to outsourcing all the
product development activities so that they can focus on defining
and marketing the product.
All OPD companies we spoke to admitted to having a mix of both.
While larger product companies bring bigger deal sizes and are
obviously more stable, the sales cycle is longer and rates
comparatively lower. The start-ups, on the other hand, are willing
to cough up a little more and close the deal faster but there's
always the risk of failure and the venture folding up. Either way,
there is no denying that the quantum of OPD work coming India's way
is on the rise. Nasscom, for example, forecasts that the OPD market
in India will touch $8-10 billion by 2008 from a little over $3
billion in 2005. It was just a $300-million industry in 2001.
And the quality of work is also improving. T R Madan Mohan,
Director, Consulting, ICT Practice, Frost & Sullivan, says,
"Companies are handling more core research and development projects,
unlike few years back where they were handling more 'D' (development
without doing the research) projects. While this is definitely more
visible in start-ups, this is also being seen across the client base
of Microsoft, IBM and Sun." Gowri Shankar Subramanian, CEO, Aspire
Systems, agrees, "As the OPD model and product building
proficiencies in India increase, larger customers will also move
towards outsourcing more and more mission-critical work."
But what's driving this business? Cost is the obvious
answer-opinions vary on the amount saved, but most analysts say it
is in the 30-35% range. But cost is not the sole driving force.
Globally, product companies are under pressure to release newer
products/versions and frequently to beat competition. Outsourcing
helps them cut time-to-market.
Then there's the issue of scaling up the in-house technology
team-easily done by tapping into India's large talent pool. Here
setting up captive facilities may not be the answer. Sudin Apte,
Senior Analyst and Country Head (India), Forrester Research,
explains, "Our research shows that the captive approach does not
suit everyone and there are several instances of challenged captive
centres. Firms like BEA Systems and Yahoo, which started with purely
captive facilities now rely more heavily on third-party providers in
India."
Tip Of The Iceberg In fact, many Indian OPD
firms see this as the beginning of a trend where a number of small
software development firms will either close down or get transferred
to their Indian vendors. “This is the tip of the iceberg,” says
Amitava Roy, President, Symphony. Citing AT Kearney’s research
findings, Roy says, “By 2008, captives will account for just 20% of
the off- shoring market in terms of employment as against 70% at
present.”
Madan Mohan of Frost & Sullivan says he sees OPD as a major
growth driver for Indian companies. "Growth will come from
e-governance, health, banking, telecom and open source areas.
Companies like Aspire and Aditi have made major strides in
developing products for non-governmental organisations, health and
banking, financial services and insurance sectors for medium-size
companies in the US and Europe," he adds.
Apte of Forrester says, "As companies across a range of
verticals, from aerospace to medical instruments, grapple to add
more value-added software to their product while cutting overall
research and development costs, this offshore segment will expand
dramatically."
And how does the OPD space compare in terms of pricing? Most
companies say it depends on the nature of the work. For challenging
assignments, the rates may be 20% higher than software application
development services. But for routine, contextual work, billing
rates could be lower than ADM. Speaking on the condition of
anonymity, officials of a mid-sized ISV told us that they had
recently outsourced some contextual work to an OPD player for $l8-19
per hour. V Chandrasekaran, CEO and Managing Director, AztecSoft,
the only listed player in the OPD segment, says billing rates are
typically lower than Tier I ADM vendors. "But margins at the gross
level are roughly equal because OPD has a much larger offshore
component," he says. So, what are the challenges ahead? Sampath
Iyengar, CEO, PSI Data Systems, says, "Today, the OPD market in
India is in a growth phase so everyone's doing well. But we see it
maturing over the next three years and that's when domain expertise
will come to play a bigger role as companies will need to offer a
differentiated model in order to ink better deals and fetch higher
rates."
Agrees Anand Deshpande, Founder, Chairman and Managing Director,
Persistent, which boasts of funding from Intel Capital and Norwest
Venture Partners. "Currently, the OPD space is largely being driven
by cost arbitrage and process efficiency, but once the market
matures, the focus will turn to design efficiency and we want to be
ready," he says. For this, the company has come up with a Go-To-Live
offering, which includes every aspect of product development
including research and design, quality analysis, cross-platform
development, deployment, integration, etc. Aditi, on its part, is
betting heavily on migration (partnering with product companies to
help them migrate to newer Microsoft platforms), while Symphony has
forayed into new areas like embedded software for the automotive,
consumer electronics and telecom verticals. As Madan Mohan says,
"One major change I foresee in OPD would be more on the lines of
open innovation, where the partner is very tightly embedded into the
product roadmap but with enough flexibility and resources to design,
test, and deploy 'new products'". "I believe companies will have to
develop processes and skill sets to manage OPD more on ownership
model than a project- transaction model," Deshpande adds. Some
companies have come to realise this and are beginning to think
ahead-of a time when growth will not come in fast and furious and
differentiated offerings will command a premium over the routine
ones. Those who can deliver on this will be tomorrow's winners.
"Margins at the gross level are roughly equal because OPD has a
much larger offshore component" V CHANDRASEKARAN, CEO AND
MD, AZTECSOFT
"Product development was the last thing a software firm wanted to
outsource to India. That has changed" PRADEEP SINGH, FOUNDER
AND CEO, ADITI
"By 2008, captives will account for just 20% of the offshoring
market in terms of employment versus 70% now" AMITAVA ROY,
PRESIDENT, SYMPHONY
"Currently, OPD is being driven by cost arbitrage, but once it
matures, design efficiency will be the focus" ANAND
DESHPANDE, FOUNDER AND CMD, PERSISTENT SYSTEMS
|
|